It's an uncomfortable truth that Tradition sometimes
has alternative, sometimes more effective ammunition against society than Radical
alternatives.
Consider
the interests and powers inevitably aligned behind the status quo.
Regard
also
the emotional appeal of what
is and what was –
of things endangered by the exorable trudge of progress – and what
may have been
- the half re-constructed, half imagined past of Downton Abbeyland.
You
can come across this kind of discourse on both sides of the political
spectrum, especially now the democratic Left have something to be
nostalgic about, but its exponents can often be found among a certain
kind of more or less thoughtful, civic-minded, small-c
conservativism.
What I
want to suggest, however, is that this discourse's prevailing relation
to society is elegiac-critical.
Elegiac,
for they mourn the past, engage in nostalgic reconstruction, or at
least find no faith in the modern.
Critical,
because at their satirical best, the middle-class small
c-conservative is clear-sighted enough to expose the
foundations of present folly, even if he or she sees no ultimate solution.
Even at their most apolitical, each look back in languour or
existential crisis allows the reading that 'things were once better.'
And that gives us space to have a conversation.To understand what they value. And to discuss how to preserve what they value in a better now.
And that gives us space to have a conversation.To understand what they value. And to discuss how to preserve what they value in a better now.
No comments:
Post a Comment